The following is an extract of a thesis researched and written by a student at a German Catholic Tertiary Institute. The student has chosen to remain anonymous in fear of reprisals from the church because the research highlights positive outcomes for sufferers, and no slippery slope.
Translated from German by NAATI accredited translator, V.R. Neale.
FOREWORD
DIGNITAS is occasionally asked by students in Switzerland and from overseas whether they could have the opportunity, within the framework of their studies, to complete at DIGNITAS headquarters the work experience required for their course.
As DIGNITAS operates with complete openness, such requests as a rule receive a positive reply, if the intended practical work is planned for at least four weeks. DIGNITAS suggests to the student that he or she during this time should spend about half the work period in normal office work, in order to get to know in depth the method used by DIGNITAS, and during the second half of the work period should complete a study, in which certain questions are examined which may interest not only DIGITAS but also the public.
The student, if he or she wishes, also gets the opportunity to be present at one or more accompanied suicides, so as to get to know from his or her own experience this part of the activities of DIGNITAS. The student is also present at interviews of persons wanting to die, with on of the doctors who work with DIGNITAS, provided that the member of DIGNITAS agrees to this.
In the present case, a student of a Catholic Tertiary Institute in Germany had applied for such a work experience. In the preliminary correspondence DIGNITAS informed the student that she should clarify with her professor whether such an activity might possibly cause her a professional disadvantage, if during her study she came to conclusions which might have a positive result for DIGNITAS – and for the question of whether suicide help should be provided.
The professor dispelled these scruples, in any case regarding the value of the work and of the study. After examining the thesis, however, he pointed out – no doubt in the well-understood interest of his student – that publication of her thesis under the name of the author and giving the name of the Tertiary Institute might have a negative effect, re employment prospects, on church supporters of organizations which might later be possible employers of the Tertiary Institute graduate. For this reason the author could not agree to the wish of DIGNITAS to publish this extract or the whole thesis under her name and naming the Tertiary Institute.
DIGNITAS thanks the author sincerely, however, for permission to publish this extract without giving her name and name of her Tertiary Technical Institute.
The study refutes the assertion spread by opponents of this “last human right” that DIGNITAS helps far too many people, and far too quickly, to an accompanied suicide. Not only is the contrary true, in fact the positive effects of the activity of DIGNITAS are much more frequent than the cases in which death is actually chosen by a member as the best solution.
Ludwig A. Minelli
General Secretary DIGNITAS
Live with human dignity – Die with human dignity.
EXTRACT FROM THE THESIS
9.0 Results of the empirical study at DIGNITAS
My study was written on the basis of members’ dossiers. I had access to 387 dossiers, which were kept in white file covers. The dossiers were of members who had requested preparation of a suicide attendance and whose applications were forwarded to doctors. In many cases, most men and women received the so-called “green light”, which means that a Swiss doctor has stated that he is prepared in principle to issue the prescription for the medication which causes death. These members, however, had since then not made further contact.
The following points interested me in this connection:
- The ratio of the sexes
- The distribution of age groups
- What percentage of those concerned
-received the “provisional green light”
-came to a personal consultation with a doctor in Switzerland
-were given a prescription for the medication which causes death
- How many days passed between the suicide request and “green light”
- After how many days did the members no longer make contact, after they had received the “green light”?
In order to ascertain this, I studied during my work experience all the white dossiers, which was very tedious and time consuming. I worked with the computer program Excel, in which I received data relevant for the study.
Applications in English, French and Italian were a special challenge. I should mention here that the DIGNITAS staff and also Mr Minelli were a very great help to me with translations, as unfortunately my knowledge of foreign languages includes only English.
In regard to the ratio of the sexes, I was able to ascertain that more women than men applied to DIGNITAS for help.
Figure 1 shows that 61% women and 39% men made an application for accompanied suicide.

Fig. 1 : Ratio of sexes. August 2005.
With 39.7% the years of birth 1929 – 1939 were most represented, the 85 – 66 year olds at this time. The next largest group with 37.8% included years of birth 1940 – 1959, the 65 – 46 year olds in the year 2005.
As Fig 2 shows the other age groups were less represented. I believe this is because the 96-86 year olds (8.2%) were possibly no longer able to write an application, or did not have access to information re accompanied suicide, or else had already died.
The remaining 14.3% were persons from year of birth 1960. I think they are represented by a lower percentage because the number of younger persons with cancer, AIDS or MS, the most common illness of members, is rather scarce.
|