While fresh attempts to change the law are made in Parliament, the Crown Prosecution Service will draw up a detailed statement on the circumstances under which it would launch cases against those who help relatives die, as ordered by the Law Lords.
An interim policy will be published by the end of September ahead of a public consultation and a final policy by the spring.
Right-to-die campaigners hope it will remove the threat of prosecution for compassionate people who want to help their loved ones end their suffering.
Opponents fear it will put vulnerable people under pressure to kill themselves, and could encourage the unscrupulous to help family members die for financial gain.
Ms Purdy launched her legal bid to have the law clarified because she wants to know if her husband, Omar Puente, would be prosecuted were he to help her end her life abroad should her suffering become unbearable.
She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I don't think there is going to be a rush to get Auntie May to the knacker's yard because they want to inherit her house.
"The DPP has got the responsibility of making sure that financial gain is definitely not something which should be allowed for assistance."
Later she told the Independent she would rather die at home rather than travel to Switzerland.
“Swiss people don’t use the Dignitas clinic, because the law allows them to die in hospital or at home,” she said.
“Foreigners do that, because we have no option.
“My choice, would be to die at 90, of old age, after the medical profession had found a cure for multiple sclerosis, but because that probably won’t happen, when life is unbearable I would prefer to be able to have an assisted death in this country and not to have to travel.”
Mark Mullins, of the Christian Legal Centre, said the House of Lords judgement created "a right to die" in law.
"This is a further departure from the Christian principle that ensured in the past the protection of the vulnerable," he said.
By Martin Beckford, Daily Telegraph, UK
|